Trust Issues

User Agreements Are Betraying You

There’s a better way for us to interact with tech companies

Woodrow Hartzog
OneZero
Published in
9 min readJun 5, 2018

--

Photo by Josh Edelson/AFP/Getty Images

TThe user agreement has become a potent symbol of our asymmetric relationship with technology firms. For most of us, it’s our first interaction with a given company. We sign up and are asked to read the dreaded user agreement — a process that we know signifies some complex and inconveniently detrimental implications of using the service, but one that we choose to ignore. Our privacy hangs in the balance, yet we skim to the end of those tedious terms and conditions just so we can share that photo, or send a group message, or update our operating system…

It’s not our fault. These agreements aren’t designed in a way that would allow us to properly consider the risks we’re taking. Tech companies have no incentive to change them. Lawmakers don’t seem to know what the alternatives are. But that doesn’t change the reality: User agreements are a legal and ethical trap, and they betray the trust of users from the very start.

The Accident of User Agreements

In the late 1990s, when lawmakers started looking for ways to protect people’s data, user agreements were a convenient place to start. Regulators were still handling the young internet market delicately…

--

--

OneZero
OneZero

Published in OneZero

OneZero is a former publication from Medium about the impact of technology on people and the future. Currently inactive and not taking submissions.

Woodrow Hartzog
Woodrow Hartzog

Written by Woodrow Hartzog

Professor of Law and Computer Science at Northeastern University School of Law and Khoury College of Computer Sciences.

Responses (6)