Member-only story

U.K. Women Are Fighting an ‘Absurd’ Law That Destroys Their Frozen Eggs

An outdated law puts a 10-year storage limit on eggs that women froze to preserve their fertility

Alex Pearlman
OneZero
8 min readDec 5, 2019

Credit: Mark Garlick/Science Photo Library/Getty Images

At first glance, Sharon Jones doesn’t seem like your everyday political activist.

The 34-year-old’s social media accounts depict the average life of an urban, Western woman: cocktails, sunsets, inspirational quotes, and weddings. She chatters animatedly in a Liverpool accent, sometimes referring to herself as “Shazza,” recounting stories about her life, her many sisters, and her search for a boyfriend.

But Jones’ quest to preserve her fertility has turned her into one of the loudest voices in a growing reproductive rights movement affecting thousands of British women. The burgeoning campaign aims to abolish the 10-year storage limit on frozen eggs that have not been preserved for medical reasons.

Under current law in the U.K., women may freeze their eggs for up to 55 years if they have a medical reason for premature infertility, such as treatment for some cancers or gender reassignment. But those with nonmedical, “social” reasons for doing so are forced to decide after 10 years to either use their eggs to make embryos, move their eggs abroad, or allow them to be destroyed.

OneZero
OneZero

Published in OneZero

OneZero is a former publication from Medium about the impact of technology on people and the future. Currently inactive and not taking submissions.

Alex Pearlman
Alex Pearlman

Written by Alex Pearlman

Reporter. Bioethicist. Publishing on the intersection of ethics and policy with emerging science and tech.

Responses (2)

Write a response

Do they have a rescue plan? Seems reasonable to help these women move their eggs in safer places, if the limit wouldn’t removed or the term wouldn’t extended.

--

The time limit seems reasonable. Talk to children of parents who had them later in life. My parents had me naturally at 40 and there are unforeseen consequences of having kids later. Think about the children’s needs instead of the wishes of the parents.

--