The Case for Removing All Politicians From Twitter

Political omnipresence has gone too far

Robert Howell
OneZero

--

Credit: Anadolu Agency/Getty Images

MMany celebrated when Jack Dorsey announced that Twitter would stop accepting political advertising. Perhaps it was a shot at Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s self-serving defense of political ads, and it probably wasn’t a major sacrifice for Twitter. And even though I believe it’s a step in the right direction, albeit with some problems, I would argue for a more radical move of not letting anyone holding political office use Twitter as a platform or a mouthpiece for that office. It’s dangerous and disruptive to allow individuals with political power to have the ability to broadcast propaganda and political noise, without intermediaries, into the private space of individuals.

It is one of the hallmarks of a totalitarian state that the politically powerful have the ability to force their messages into the private lives of the populace. George Orwell anticipated it in 1984 with “telescreens” that constantly broadcast propaganda, and North Korea has reportedly implemented a similar system, wiring each individual home with a one-way radio. There is no way to turn off the voice of Kim Jong Un, the Great Successor, and removing the device is criminal.

Twitter gives those in power, like President Trump, the ability to deliver their messages to our…

--

--

Robert Howell
OneZero

Robert Howell is professor of philosophy at SMU. Author of Consciousness and the Limits of Objectivity (Oxford, 2013).