OneZero

OneZero is a former publication from Medium about the impact of technology on people and the future. Currently inactive and not taking submissions.

Follow publication

The Best Reason for Your City to Ban Facial Recognition

The technology isn’t ready. Society isn’t ready. And the law isn’t ready.

Will Oremus
OneZero
Published in
5 min readMay 17, 2019

Photo: fanjianhua/Getty

This week, San Francisco became the first major U.S. city to bar itself from using facial recognition systems. The city’s Board of Supervisors voted 8–1 on Tuesday to prohibit the police and other public agencies — though not private companies — from using the emerging technology in any form as part of a larger bill to regulate broader surveillance efforts.

Some cheered the move as a victory for privacy and civil liberties. Some criticized it as a blow to law enforcement and public safety. And cynics dismissed it as an empty gesture, given that San Francisco wasn’t using facial recognition technology in the first place.

We’re not prepared as a society to ensure that facial recognition will be used responsibly and without discriminatory effects.

But you don’t have to be a hippie or a Luddite to see the logic in a ban like San Francisco’s. It makes sense even if the effect is nil in the short term, and even if you think facial recognition could be a valuable tool in the long term. The logic is simple: We’re not ready for it.

We’re not prepared as a society to ensure that facial recognition will be used responsibly and without discriminatory effects. We’re not prepared as individuals for a world in which we can be automatically tracked and identified wherever we go without our knowledge or consent.

Even if we were ready, the technology itself isn’t: Experts both inside and outside the technology industry acknowledge that the artificial intelligence underlying facial recognition systems still struggles with accuracy, particularly when it comes to identifying the faces of people of color — which is to say, the people who are most likely to be affected by it. In a test last year by the ACLU, Amazon’s facial recognition software falsely matched the faces of 28 members of U.S. Congress to the mug shots of people who had been arrested. The mismatches disproportionately affected representatives of color.

Perhaps most important, our governments and law enforcement agencies are not…

Create an account to read the full story.

The author made this story available to Medium members only.
If you’re new to Medium, create a new account to read this story on us.

Or, continue in mobile web

Already have an account? Sign in

OneZero
OneZero

Published in OneZero

OneZero is a former publication from Medium about the impact of technology on people and the future. Currently inactive and not taking submissions.

Will Oremus
Will Oremus

Written by Will Oremus

Senior Writer, OneZero, at Medium

Responses (28)

Write a response

We’re not ready for it.

I agree with every word in the article except this — because there’s an implication that we might someday be ready for a society based on facial recognition.
I believe humans will never be ready for a universal surveillance society. The pitfalls are too great, and the benefits too small.

--

Will Oremus agreed: not only is law enforcement not ready for the technology — I don’t think they ever could be trusted with it.

--

Almost every form of oppression is sold as “to root out the bad people,” of course. But that’s all ANY form of privacy violation ever is and ever will be — oppression. Surveillance like such as this (among many other forms) boils down to math. You…

--