Member-only story
The Decision That Informed Twitter’s Move Against the NY Post
The process was similar to a fateful moderation decision from May
A story in the New York Post Wednesday morning guaranteed a wild day in both Washington and the nation’s newsrooms. These days, that tends to make for a chaotic day in the executive offices of Silicon Valley-based social networks, too. But the chaos unfolds in slightly different ways at Facebook and Twitter.
The story, which revolved around supposedly incriminating emails found on a laptop that may or may not have belonged to Hunter Biden, tested the internet platforms’ misinformation policies at the most critical time. Facebook responded first. It left the story up but limited the speed at which it could spread while awaiting a verdict from its fact-checking partners. The company said this was standard procedure under its policies on fact-checking and political misinformation, though it struggled to immediately provide prior examples in which it limited a post’s distribution before its fact-checkers had weighed in. (Here’s one.)
Twitter acted second but more aggressively: It began blocking all sharing of links to the Post story, or even screenshots of its text. It cited a different policy, one that prohibits the sharing of “hacked material.” That policy has been enforced…
