OneZero

OneZero is a former publication from Medium about the impact of technology on people and the future. Currently inactive and not taking submissions.

Follow publication

How Adobe InDesign Conquered the World of Graphic Design

Adobe InDesign’s initial release looked like a complete flop. Here’s how the company turned things around.

Ernie Smith
OneZero
Published in
7 min readOct 3, 2019

Illustration: Noah Baker

TTwenty years ago, Adobe unleashed InDesign, a new vision of desktop publishing. The program, which launched as a $700 CD-ROM, was destined to reshape the field of graphic design — but it needed to win over skeptical publishers first.

InDesign 1.0 received a fairly strong review in PC Magazine in 1999 that noted innovative features like optical kerning, which allowed designers to elegantly tighten and loosen the spaces between characters, and text gradients, which painted letters in multiple colors. But the critic, Luisa Simone, wrote that developing a good user experience was only half the battle for Adobe. “We expect the publishing industry to reserve judgement on InDesign until it proves itself in a production environment,” she wrote.

And publishers, at least at first, decided InDesign wasn’t for them. Most companies stuck with the de facto standard of the era, QuarkXPress. This meant that the design of books, magazines, newspapers, flyers, and billboards remained outside of Adobe’s domain.

The company had a lot of work to do. Even the project’s codename suggested a steep climb. Adobe had acquired Aldus, the maker of a legendary publishing tool called PageMaker, in 1994, and it used that program as a starting point for InDesign. The project was code-named K2, after the second-tallest mountain in the world — not because Adobe wanted to be second fiddle to QuarkXPress in the desktop publishing space, but because K2, located in China, is considered a more difficult trek than Mount Everest.

“InDesign uses a radically new architecture, one that’s totally different from PageMaker or any other desktop program for that matter,” early Adobe evangelist Tim Cole told the Sydney Morning Herald in 1999. “This alone made the whole project very complex, and we also realize we need to build a 1.0 version that’s a mature, high-end publishing application. So, the metaphor of scaling the world’s most challenging and most deadly mountain was very suitable.”

“Service bureaus weren’t accepting InDesign files — they…

Create an account to read the full story.

The author made this story available to Medium members only.
If you’re new to Medium, create a new account to read this story on us.

Or, continue in mobile web

Already have an account? Sign in

OneZero
OneZero

Published in OneZero

OneZero is a former publication from Medium about the impact of technology on people and the future. Currently inactive and not taking submissions.

Ernie Smith
Ernie Smith

Written by Ernie Smith

Editor of @readtedium, the dull side of the internet. You may know me from @ShortFormBlog. Subscribe to my thought machine: http://tedium.co/

Responses (17)

Write a response

Great article. I remember this time and notably, how nasty Quark’s customer support was and how ridiculous their pricing was (particularly vs. the entire “Creative Suite” — when that happened). Plus, as others mentioned in their comments, being able…

--

Thanks for sharing such fun memories! There’s no doubt that Adobe released InDesign 1.0 about a year too early… it was pretty ridiculous.
If you want to see how simple ID1 was (but why it was still pretty brilliant), watch this short little video…

--

You could have mentioned the cost difference to update Quark vs getting Indesign. Huge factor in getting freelancers and small companies to change.

--