Did Setting a Timeline Doom the Fight Against Global Warming?

Advocates and some scientists argue that the world has only years to avert catastrophic climate change — but the public reaction has largely backfired

Matthew MacDonald
OneZero

--

Credit: Alexandros Maragos/Getty Images

EEvery thinking person has had to ignore an apocalyptic warning at some point in their life. Whether it’s a prediction about malfunctioning computers triggering the end of civilization, or a religious-tinted prophecy about the end times, there are plenty of people trying to capture our attention with doomsday scenarios.

What is out of the ordinary is when buttoned-down scientists go on the record predicting a concrete date for catastrophe. After all, science speaks cautiously in correlations and confidence intervals. It doesn’t announce the oncoming end of the world.

But in the last 20 years, a number of scientists have gone on record to set a timeline for catastrophic global warming. In 2006, NASA scientist James Hansen predicted a 10-year window to take action on global warming. In 2007, UN scientists at the IPCC gave the world just eight years to cap emissions and avoid the worst effects of climate change. Also at the UN, Noel Brown, director of the New York office of the UN Environment Program, once declared that there were 10 years before…

--

--

Matthew MacDonald
OneZero

Teacher, coder, long-ago Microsoft MVP. Author of heavy books. Join Young Coder for a creative take on science and technology. Queries: matthew@prosetech.com